Oles Odynets2 days ago
Almost all of businesses in the world are just abstractions closing gaps of other abstractions. There are way too many layers. In the root all of it - same as millions of years ago - food.
Almost all of businesses in the world are just abstractions closing gaps of other abstractions. There are way too many layers. In the root all of it - same as millions of years ago - food.
The content of this message is not available to you.
The content of this message is not available to you.
We're in space now.
Assume LLMs in an agentic loop can trick any human-written program into serving the agent's goals - stated, inferred, or assumed. Under that assumption, how could we trust any harness to actually contain the agent? PS. If you answered “then we’ll just write harnesses with more powerful LLMs”, think again.
Outside all the buzz-fake-hype and "never hallucinates" marketing, Jev actually feels like a breath of fresh air. Not everyday I get to play Pong in realtime speed with a model that is context-agnostic and takes natural text as its input. Fun.
ᗡɒlmɒƨ Tɒγloɿ wɒƨ ɒ ʇunnγ mɒn.
Attunebench, which tests for emotional intelligence, placed Opus 4.6 at #1 place in the leaderboard. Surprise, surprise.
T2: So what? Who cares about code anyway? Well, humans do. Specifically, the users of your app. Actually, let me be more precise: your users don't care about the code. They care about stability. The brain will endorse an app that just works. The brain will put you in agony when you're trying to send an email after an agent, let loose by some developer at your mail provider, decided that "position: sticky" is a trend that got reborn and the send button should definitely flex with it. And what's the most obvious way to achieve system stability in an application? Spoiler: it's not a good system prompt.
Vibe coding and badly applied agentic engineering (which almost everyone applies badly) slow your development down. Before this poor adoption wave, which big tech only accelerated, every second of thinking went into leveling up - like XP in video games. Slow, almost invisible, but over time it built people who could feel what code would do and where it would break before they wrote a single line. Now people vibe code the base of a project, then try to extend it by hand. In my experience, they almost always fail. You can't build manually on a fragile base that only survives contact with a machine: 200 hands patching every hole the second it opens. That doesn't mean the glass is sound. It means 200 stickers are covering the leaks. Too many holes, and you can guess what happens.